You've heard the good news that cancer death rates have fallen over
the past 16 years and the total number of deaths from cancer dropped
in the U.S. for the second year in a row in 2004. But this doesn't
mean you're not at risk. This year, the estimated numbers of new cases
of cancer are about 767,000 in men and 678,000 in women. The estimated
numbers of deaths from cancer this year are about 290,000 in men and
270,000 in women.
What can you do to lessen the likelihood that
you will be one of the nearly 560,000 people who will be die of cancer
in 2007 or of the untold millions who will die of it in future years?
Researchers have not pinpointed exactly the
factors-environmental and genetic-most responsible for the vast
majority of cancers. But here are a few actions you should keep in
mind that are known to lower cancer risk:
Don't expose yourself to smoke, either
your own or that of others. In addition to the direct risk of
smoking, studies clearly show the cancer risk of secondhand smoke,
which is becoming easier to avoid with the increasing bans on smoking
in public places.
- Eat more fruits and vegetables. Available
evidence indicates that people who eat more fruits and vegetables
and less red meat have a lower risk of developing cancer.
- Control your weight. Data
from the American Cancer Society have shown a strong association
between obesity and cancer. The ongoing epidemic of obesity in
this country may put an end to the decline in cancer rates in the
future. So, eat right, don't smoke, and control your weight by
cutting down on calories and by exercising regularly.
- Get regular screenings. You
can also protect against bad outcomes from cancer by taking
advantage of the screening tests available for early detection of
cancer. A PSA test for prostate cancer and a mammography for
breast cancer are accompanied by minimal discomfort. Colonoscopy
scares away many people, but this test is crucial for identifying
early forms of colorectal cancer or polyps that might later become
cancerous.
Quite frankly, I had not followed my internist's
admonitions to have a colonoscopy until I developed some of the
warning signs of colon cancer. The colonoscopy procedure, now done
under heavy sedation, was so painless that I was amazed to wake up and
find that it had been completed. Of course, I was delighted and
relieved when my gastroenterologist said he had found only a couple of
small polyps, which turned out to be benign.
I then realized I could have avoided all those
weeks of needless worry while I steeled myself to have the procedure
done. Many others, I suspect, are less concerned about the discomfort
of the procedure than they are afraid that they will learn they have
colorectal cancer.
I agree with my doctor, who said that a person
should be ashamed to die of colorectal cancer because he or she was
afraid to undergo a colonoscopy. I must admit that taking the
bowel-cleansing medications the day before the colonoscopy was far
more unpleasant than the procedure itself.
As far as lung cancer screening goes, you might
think that imaging techniques could easily detect the disease early
on. Unfortunately, studies in the 1990s showed that chest x-rays were
not an effective screening method for lung cancer. However, computed
tomography (CT) scans of the lungs can detect much smaller lung
lesions than can standard x-rays and so might become widely used to
identify early lung cancers.
One recent study of CT involved people at high
risk for lung cancer because they either were smokers or were exposed
to large amounts of secondhand smoke. Biopsies were then done on 535
of these subjects whose CT scans showed suspicious lesions; lung
cancer was found in 484 of the biopsies. While these findings show
hope for the future, it is obvious that about 10 percent of the people
undergoing CT scans would face the unnecessary costs and discomfort of
a lung biopsy.
For many types of cancer, the rise in the number
of people who survive at least 5 years after a diagnosis is clear
evidence for both the advantages of early detection and successful
treatment. But for many other types of cancer, including cancers of
the uterus, cervix, larynx, lung, and pancreas, the 5-year survival
rate has not gotten any better over the past 25 years.